
Teach your engineers to work with AI agents, not against them
Most engineering teams have tried AI coding tools and found them either underwhelming or unpredictable. The problem is not the tools. Working with agents requires a different set of skills than writing code by hand. Without coaching, teams either abandon the tools or use them badly.
We coach your engineers on practical workflows: how to prompt effectively, set up review boundaries, and build the habits that turn AI agents into a genuine force multiplier for your specific codebase and team.
Developers completed coding tasks 55% faster with AI assistance in a controlled trial of professional software engineers. GitHub / Microsoft Research.
Practical habits and workflows that make AI agents work for your team, not against it
Three places this changes your business
Most teams have a few people who use AI coding agents effectively and many who tried once and gave up. That gap is a skills problem, not a tools problem. Coaching brings the whole team to the level of your best adopters.
A 40-person engineering org goes from 20% regular agent usage to 85% within eight weeks after a structured coaching engagement.
AI agents compress the time between idea and implementation for repetitive work: boilerplate, tests, documentation, refactoring. Coaching teaches engineers which tasks to delegate and how to get useful output the first time.
A product team cuts the average time for a new API endpoint from 3 days to under 1, by training engineers to delegate scaffolding to agents while retaining control over design decisions.
Speed is worth nothing if the code needs extensive rework. Coaching covers the review side of agentic work: how to evaluate agent output critically, which checks to automate, and when to write it yourself.
A fintech company establishes a peer review checklist for agent-generated code, reducing review cycles from an average of 4 to 1.5 per pull request.